![5820k cinebench 5820k cinebench](https://www.fudzilla.com/images/stories/2016/May/cinebench-core-i7-6850k-vs-core-i7-5820k.jpg)
The 4770K was tested with DDR3-2400 memory and the 8700K with DDR4-3200 memory.īefore we get to the gaming results, we have some Cinebench R15 scores along with some Corona benchmarks and power consumption figures. For testing, we paired the 5820K with quad-channel DDR4-2666 memory and that's the highest memory speed our processor would work with, at least with the sticks we have available. On maximum quality, that margin was reduced to just 10% which fell further to 4% when increasing the GPU workload to 1440p.Īlthough we don't expect to find much difference with the 5820K, you guys still love benchmark results and so do we, so we won't let that little fact stop us.
5820k cinebench 1080p#
What we can say upfront is that if you're mostly gaming on the 5820K right now, it's probably not worth jumping ship for the 8700K and it makes more sense to wait given what we saw from our recent retest of the Haswell-based 4770K.Ĭlock for clock, at 4.8GHz the 4770K was just 15% slower at 1080p using medium quality settings with a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
5820k cinebench plus#
Our focus will be on gaming for this retest and the aim is to accomplish two things: 1) to show those of you currently using a 5820K what advantages there may be to upgrading, and 2) to provide second-hand shoppers with information on whether the 5820K and an accompanying X99 motherboard are worth snapping up - $200 for the 5820K plus $80-$100 for a supporting motherboard looks like a great value on paper. Intel's high-end desktop platform actually faced some real competition in 2017, something it's never really seen. Of course, 2017 also brought the Ryfor $200 and the 8 core/16 thread R7 1700 which can be had for $290. Since the release of the 5820K, we saw the 6800K jack this category's price up to well over $400 and then last year the 7800X went back down to $390.
![5820k cinebench 5820k cinebench](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6x3nphhZYkA/maxresdefault.jpg)
As was the case with previous generations, quad-channel memory support remained and the official spec called for DDR4-2133. The socket change was somewhat justified this time seeing as Haswell-E saw the adoption of DDR4 memory on Intel's high-end desktop platform. Today, the chip can be purchased for nearly half the price it originally fetched and we managed to find one online for around $200, which seems to be about the going price.īy default, the 5820K works at a base frequency of 3.3GHz but depending on the workload it can boost up to 3.6GHz (a mild increase, admittedly) and it also packs 15MB of 元 cache alongside 1.5MB of L2 cache, which was a significant increase over the mainstream Core i7 range back in 2014.Īlthough the chip is pin-compatible with the previous-generation Ivy Bridge-E and Sandy Bridge-E boards, we got an upgraded socket, LGA2011v3. The single-core test of the Cinebench R23 only stresses a single CPU core and doesn't use multiple cores or hyper-threading.Released in August 2014 for a reasonable $390 - the most affordable Haswell-E processor available at the time - Intel's hexa-core Core i7-5820K has proven popular among enthusiast builders over the years and it's about time we see how it compares against more modern CPUs. This is quite useful in testing laptop processors. R23 also supports longer testing durations to detect possible CPU throttling. It is the successor to the Cinebench R20 and provides many improvements to take advantage of the newer processors.
5820k cinebench software#
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)Ĭinebench R23 is a cross-platform CPU benchmark tool that uses the same rendering engine as the Cinema 4D software suite. In the following sections, we compare the average CPU performance benchmarks of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Core i7-5820K. 768 KB L1 cache, 4 MB L2 cache, 16 MB 元 cacheĭDR4 at 1600 MHz, DDR4 at 1866 MHz, DDR4 at 2133 MHz